|
This Study was to investigate elaborated research themes and direction through specifying the problems of clinical practice education and looking for the direction of improvement. It was in the basis of the viewpoint of the educators that professors and therapists who were the subjects of this study. Perform this study, the 15 colleges’ professors and the 55 hospitals’ therapists was made up questionnaire, and the data was analysing by Chi-square test and percentage. The results were as follow : In a personal history among the general qualities, professors have little clinical practice history(l-5 years, 53.3%), and therapists have little lecture career(1-5 years, 43.6%, have no 49.0%), The 78.6% subjects were unsatisfied of clinical practice systems. The correlation between clinical history, school career and lecture career and the satisfaction level of clinical practice systems has no(P<.005), The subjects were agreed to that clinical practice curriculum should be changed(67.1%), reinforced(82.9%), and specified(90.0%). The clinical practice credits are 11 points averagely. In the clinical practice curriculum, it made no difference in the practicum of diseases, modality, and the therapeutic techniques between professors and therapists. The 100% professors said that the practicum of the patients’ assessment is necessary, and the 63.6% therapists were training for that. The 66.7% professors said that the practicum of the clinical psychology is necessary, and only the 20.0% therapists were training for that. The 93.3% professors said that the practicum of the patients’ management is necessary, and the 50.9% therapists were training for that. The 66.7% professors said that the practicum of the medical ethics is necessary, and the 34.5% therapists were training for that. The 46.7% professors said that the practicum of the hospital administration is necessary, but the 54.5% therapists have not training. The 33.3% professors said that the practicum of the pharmacology is necessary, but the 81.8% therapists have not training. The 86.7% professors said that the practicum of the patient’s education is necessary, and the 43.6% therapists have training. The 66.7% professors said that the practicum of the prosthesis and brace is necessary, but the 14.5% therapists have not training. The 60.0% professors said that the practicum of the exercise prescription is necessary, but the 25.5% therapists have not training. The 53.5% professors said that the practicum of the emergency treatment is necessary, but the 52.7% therapists have not training. Drawing up the plan about the curriculum of clinical practice, the professors (46.7%) were agreed to national master plan framing by an expert advisor, but the therapists (58.2%) said that the plan that make the most of hospitals’ characteristics should be specified. It was found that a clinical special therapists(54.5%) was good as a person in charge of clinical practice education, in that each therapist’s own good time (34.5%) was. It made use of the form framing by college(40.0%) as the clinical practice textbook, the form framing by hospital (42.9%) and each therapist(22.9%) as the plan, and the form framing by college (74.3%) as the measurement. The most difficult point in clinical practice education was the lacks of the theory-praciticum linkage(78.2%). It was found that the period of clinical practice was in the second semester-third grade (40.0%) and the desirable period was in the first semester-third grade(50.0%). Professors (53.3%) were agreed that the desirable clinical practice duration was from four months to six months(60.0%), and the therapists (60.0%) were agreed that from one month to three months. This study presented the lacks of rearing the experts, the lacks of cultural education, and the lacks of the theory-clinical practice linkage. There were need to develop the systematic programs, clinical practice textbooks, the measurements and the special hospital for clinical practice. And it was need to reduce the gab between of the hospitals for clinical practice, to cut down the costs. and to improve the labour conditions of leaders. In view of this findings, it takes notice of that both professor and therapist were dissatisfied at the present clinical practice systems. These results point out the problems of clinical practice systems, and do not make expect to us the successive and positive clinical practice. The general, specific and intensive plan about the problems and the direction of improvement that establishing the level of hospital for clinical practice and physiotherapy can be elaborated.
|